WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court took up an e-cigarette case Tuesday, weighing Food and Drug Administration decisions blocking the marketing of sweet flavored products amid a surge in vaping by ...
Forty years ago, the Supreme Court ruled 6-0, with three justices recused, that judges should play a limited, deferential role when evaluating the actions of agency experts in a case brought by ...
This term, the Supreme Court repeatedly rolled back the administrative state and strengthened the judiciary's power over the ...
Trump has a "really powerful weapon to go smash up the cases that have been brought against him," expert says.
Grand jurors should never have seen "official-act" evidence, Trump's lawyers now argue, claiming this fatally "taints" the ...
In a new filing Thursday, former President Donald Trump launched a wholesale attack not just on his conviction in the New ...
The Supreme Court issued several consequential rulings in its recently concluded term. One such decision reversed a 40-year ...
The liberal justices accused their colleagues of crowning a king this term, but legal experts say the king-makers are the ...
the case was kicked back to the lower courts to figure those parts out first (after which those decisions will no doubt again be appealed to the Supreme Court). Wrote Roberts: “At least with ...
The U.S. Supreme Court recently clarified the scope of such ... Official Rules superseded the user agreement as a whole. See, e.g., Petitioner’s Brief at 36-44, Coinbase v.
A top Democratic appropriator is looking at renewing an effort to prevent Supreme Court operational funds from being accessed until the court implements an enforceable ethics code.
Barrett's opinions in the court's most recent term showed a willingness to separate herself from the conservative majority.